Montana Legislature Introduces Forfeiture
Reform Bill
by Judy Osburn
In addition to
assuring that
state courts may only forfeit property from owners who have been
convicted of a
related crime, this important reform legislation would curtail the
perversion of law enforcement priorities caused by the profit motive of
agencies
keeping seized property.
Montana's HB 775,
introduced February 19, would revise Montana
state
forfeiture laws to require criminal convictions of property owners
before
property may be forfeited by the state. The bill also would eliminate
the profit motive that corrupts priorities of police and prosecutorsby
directing proceeds from
state forfeitures, as well as local shares from federal forfeitures,
into a state fund for public defenders . By providing that all
state forfeitures be imposed upon conviction
of a criminal
offense as part of sentencing, the bill would also
eliminate
state civil forfeiture proceedings that declare property guilty of
crime, regardless of the guilt or innocence of its owner.
The bill would also require sheriffs to immediately
return
property to innocent lien holders who provide proof of a security
interest
equal to or greater than the value of the seized property.
Proceeds of forfeited property sold at
auction would be distributed to innocent owners with a secured interest
less
than the entire value, with the remaining proceeds to be deposited in
the
state
fund for distribution to public defender offices. HB
775
would also prohibit sale of seized property to an officer or
employee of a law enforcement agency.
The revision to Montana forfeiture laws would also
create a
state civil action similar to suits against law enforcement officers
and
agencies for civil rights violations similar to the form of action
created in
federal law by 42 U.S.C. 1983. A public
official or employee who illegally seizes, holds, disposes of, or takes
any
other unlawful action in regard to seized property
would be
subject to a civil suit by the property owner. The action against
the public official or employee would be
against that
person as a private individual acting outside of his or her official
capacity,
and the bill would prohibit public funds from being used to pay costs
of legal
defense or damages awards against such public official or
employee. A person who attempts to cover up or
obstruct an act that is actionable under this bill would become liable
for the
act giving rise to the civil rights suit.
The civil rights suit would not apply
to a peace officer who has probable cause to make an arrest, a peace
officer
serving a warrant who has reasonable cause to believe that the warrant
has been
properly issued, a judicial officer acting in a normal judicial
capacity, nor
any circumstance that includes full compliance with due process of
law. A public official or employee acting in
compliance with the law would be immune from civil suit under this
bill. Such
determination that an employee was acting lawfully within the scope of
his or
her employment would be made by the government entity upon application
of the
employee or by court order. An employee who acts legally within the
scope
of employment would be indemnified by the government employer for any
monetary
judgments or legal expenses, and recovery against the government entity
would
bar any action against the individual official or employee.
All too
often after state forfeiture reform laws require a
criminal conviction of the owner before property may be forfeited,
seizing
agencies simply turn over civil forfeiture proceedings to federal
courts and continue to collect
up to 80% of the forfeited proceeds. Once enacted, in addition to
assuring that
state courts may only forfeit property from owners who have been
convicted of a
related crime, this important reform legislation would curtail the
perversion of law enforcement priorities caused by the lure of agencies
keeping
the proceeds of seized property. Once
enacted, this bill will end police piracy in Montana while preserving
forfeiture’s legitimate goal of taking the profit out of crime.
Track the progress
of this bill at
http://laws.leg.mt.gov/pls/laws07/law0203w$.startup